Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David C. DUFF, Tamara A. Duff and Patricia A. Cox, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robin E. FOSTER, et al., Defendants, Chris M. Krukowski and Laura J. Fuller, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries they sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Tamara A. Duff (plaintiff) was operating a vehicle in which the remaining plaintiffs were passengers, and a vehicle owned by defendant Laura J. Fuller and operated by defendant Chris M. Krukowski was traveling behind the vehicle operated by plaintiff. Krukowski's vehicle, in turn, was followed by a vehicle operated by defendant Stephanie L. Foster. As plaintiff signaled a left-hand turn and slowed down in order to complete that turn, Krukowski passed the vehicle operated by plaintiff on the right, driving partially onto the right shoulder of the road in order to do so. At that time, the vehicle operated by Foster rear-ended the vehicle operated by plaintiff as she was attempting to complete the left-hand turn. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Krukowski and Fuller for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and all cross claims against them. Those defendants met their initial burden by establishing that Krukowski was able to maneuver his vehicle past the vehicle operated by plaintiff without striking that vehicle and that the injuries sustained by plaintiffs resulted from the rear-end collision with the vehicle operated by Foster. “ ‘Under the circumstances, any alleged negligence on the part of [Krukowski and Fuller] was not a proximate cause of plaintiff[s'] injuries' ” (Princess v. Pohl, 38 A.D.3d 1323, 1323, 833 N.Y.S.2d 788, lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 802, 840 N.Y.S.2d 567, 872 N.E.2d 253).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 24, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)