PEOPLE v. QUINTANA (1997)

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered February 24, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's suppression motions were properly denied.   The evidence adduced at the hearing demonstrates that the complainant and eyewitnesses in the crowd provided the sending officer a sufficiently detailed description of the incident, the robbers, and their escape route.   The evidence further established that immediately after receiving the sending officer's radioed description, a group of police officers kept in constant radio communication updating each other on the robbers' location (see, People v. Mims, 88 N.Y.2d 99, 113, 643 N.Y.S.2d 502, 666 N.E.2d 207) as they actively pursued them with the aid of civilians who had witnessed their movements.   Based on the initial radio transmission, the police had reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant was armed and had committed a crime.   They were thus permitted, as they did, to forcibly detain him pending a showup by the complainant.   Once the complainant identified defendant, the police had probable cause to arrest him (People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223, 386 N.Y.S.2d 375, 352 N.E.2d 562).   The showup and photographic identification procedures were not unduly suggestive (People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541, 569 N.Y.S.2d 346, 571 N.E.2d 654;  People v. Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 336, 553 N.Y.S.2d 72, 552 N.E.2d 608,cert denied 498 U.S. 833, 111 S.Ct. 99, 112 L.Ed.2d 70).   We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.