Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence MUDD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J. at plea; John P. Collins, J. at plea withdrawal motion; Thomas Farber, J. at sentence), rendered October 6, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea upon its consideration of the plea minutes and the parties' written submissions, without further inquiry (see People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332 [1978] ). The record establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and it contradicts defendant's claims of innocence and coercion. There was nothing coercive or improper about the fact that defendant's cousin, a Legal Aid Society attorney, participated in his defense and shared information with his original Legal Aid attorney in the course of the representation. Defendant specifically agreed to be represented by his cousin at the plea, expressed satisfaction with the services of both attorneys, and stated that no one had forced him to plead guilty. Furthermore, the record supports the conclusion that the cousin rendered her professional opinion that defendant's best interests would be served by accepting the favorable disposition being offered (under which defendant could have earned probation had he successfully completed a drug program). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)