Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GL Botanical, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Micah Crawford-Escala, Defendant-Appellant.
Per Curiam.
Order (Verena C. Powell, J.), entered October 6, 2025, reversed, without costs, defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment is granted to the extent of setting the matter down for a traverse hearing to determine whether defendant was properly served and for further proceedings in accordance herewith.
While plaintiff's affidavit of service constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Njoku, 148 AD3d 438 [2017]), defendant's sworn nonconclusory denial of service was sufficient to dispute the veracity or content of the affidavit, requiring a traverse hearing (see NYCTL 1998-1 Trust & Bank of NY v Rabinowitz, 7 AD3d 459, 460 [2004]). Specifically, the parties' competing averments raise a factual issue concerning whether defendant no longer lived at the subject address at time of service (see Avis Rent A Car Sys., LLC v Scaramellino, 161 AD3d 572 [2018]).
With respect to the portion of defendant's motion seeking relief pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), the court's determination that defendant lacked a reasonable excuse for his default apparently turned on its rejection of defendant's sworn assertion that he was not served with the summons and complaint. However, those assertions raise issues of credibility to be explored at the hearing (see Marable v Williams, 278 AD2d 459, 460 [2000]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: June 15, 2026
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570456 /26
Decided: June 15, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)