Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Walter K. TELFER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nicole L. PICKARD, Respondent-Respondent.
Petitioner father filed two petitions, one seeking to modify a prior order and the other alleging that respondent mother had violated that prior order. We conclude that Family Court properly dismissed the petitions. The prior order required the mother to mail to the father, who is incarcerated, a photograph of the parties' child every other month, along with a letter describing the photograph and any important events in the child's life that had occurred since the prior letter was sent. The petitions were filed 1 1/212 months following entry of the prior order. The father alleged in one petition that the mother had failed to mail the father a photograph of the child, and he sought modification of the prior order by instead requiring a third party to bring the child to visit him. The father alleged in the other petition that the mother had violated the prior order by failing to send him any pictures of the child or any correspondence concerning the child. We conclude with respect to the modification petition that the father “ ‘fail[ed] to allege a sufficient change in circumstances requiring modification in the best interest[s] of the child[ ]’ ” (Matter of Reczko v. Reczko, 278 A.D.2d 876, 876, 718 N.Y.S.2d 511), and we conclude with respect to the violation petition that, at the time the petitions were filed, there was no evidence of the mother's willful violation of the prior order.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 06, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)