POL v. Kamran Tabaddor, M.D., Defendant-Respondent. (2008)

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered January 9, 2007, which, in an action for medical malpractice, granted defendant-respondent's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff and affording him the benefit of every favorable inference, there is no competent, nonspeculative expert evidence that defendant, who was the assistant surgeon and played no direct role in plaintiff's care, committed any departures from accepted medical practice or could have prevented the alleged departures committed by the lead surgeon, with whom plaintiff has settled.   Although plaintiff's expert testified that defendant had a duty to advise the lead surgeon during the operation that his methods were not in accordance with accepted practice, the expert conceded that the lead surgeon had ultimate responsibility for making all decisions with respect to the operation and could not have been compelled to follow any such advice.   In the absence of evidence that defendant exercised any control over the lead surgeon (see generally Kavanaugh v. Nussbaum, 71 N.Y.2d 535, 546-547, 528 N.Y.S.2d 8, 523 N.E.2d 284 [1988] ), no valid line of reasoning (see Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499, 410 N.Y.S.2d 282, 382 N.E.2d 1145 [1978] ) could have led a rational jury to conclude that any such advice, if given, would have been followed.