Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jesus SANCHEZ, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J., at plea; John P. Collins, J., at sentence), rendered September 28, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 1/212 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal; the court elicited such a waiver as part of the plea agreement, and separately from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256-257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ). The waiver forecloses appellate review of defendant's claim that the period of post-release supervision imposed should be reduced because the court allegedly intended to impose the minimum permissible supervision term. Although a challenge to the voluntariness of a plea survives an appeal waiver, the record establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. In particular, defendant was informed of the precise post-release supervision term he was facing. Moreover, on appeal he does not seek vacatur of the plea, but only reduction of the supervision term in the interest of justice.
In any event, defendant's claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. The record does not support defendant's claim that the court intended to impose the minimum permissible term of post-release supervision, or that it made any such statement to defendant.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)