Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Custody, etc., ASHLEY MARIE M. A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Yolanda M., Respondent–Appellant, McMahon Services for Children, et al., Petitioners–Respondents.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Maureen McLeod, J.), entered on or about May 2, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, denied respondent-appellant's motion to vacate an order of the same court (Cira Martinez, J.), entered on or about April 28, 1999, upon respondent's defaults in appearing at the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminating her parental rights to the subject child upon a finding of permanent neglect and committing the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent shows neither a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the hearings nor a meritorious defense to the proceeding (Matter of “Male” Jones, 128 A.D.2d 403, 512 N.Y.S.2d 689). Although respondent eventually provided documentation of medical treatment that prevented her attendance in court on the day of the hearings, she does not explain why she failed to contact her attorney, the court or the agency to advise of her unavailability. Nor does she explain why she waited almost nine months after the inquests to submit a motion to vacate her defaults (see, Matter of Baby Girl S., 240 A.D.2d 215, 658 N.Y.S.2d 595, lv. dismissed 91 N.Y.2d 887, 668 N.Y.S.2d 564, 691 N.E.2d 636). Also unsubstantiated were respondent's conclusory and inconsistent assertions that she had complied with the agency's goals or was physically unable to do so (see, Matter of Wesley Antonio C., 268 A.D.2d 299, 702 N.Y.S.2d 34).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 16, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)