Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Basilio Montezuma REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on or about May 25, 2006, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly assessed 30 points under the risk factor for prior crimes based on defendant's conviction of second-degree burglary, which is a “violent felony” under Penal Law § 70.02(1)(b), and is therefore a “violent felony” under the guidelines of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v. Wroten, 286 A.D.2d 189, 197-99, 732 N.Y.S.2d 513 [2001], lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 610, 740 N.Y.S.2d 694, 767 N.E.2d 151 [2002] ). The guidelines' use of the Penal Law definition is consistent with the intent of the underlying statute (Correction Law § 168-l [5][b][ii],[iii] ), which does not suggest in any manner that only those prior crimes that involve actual violence should be considered.
The court also properly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse, based on defendant's admissions to drug abuse (see People v. Roland, 292 A.D.2d 271, 739 N.Y.S.2d 694 [2002], lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 614, 751 N.Y.S.2d 169, 780 N.E.2d 980 [2002] ). Contrary to defendant's argument, the applicable guideline requires a history of substance abuse, and not necessarily a drug-related conviction. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments concerning the court's assessment under this risk factor.
Defendant did not establish any special circumstances warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v. Guaman, 8 A.D.3d 545, 778 N.Y.S.2d 704 [2004] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 14, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)