Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher FONDREN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered March 9, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 3 1/212 years and a fine of $25, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's arguments concerning his conviction of second-degree weapon possession are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the evidence of defendant's intent to use the weapon unlawfully was legally sufficient in light of the statutory presumption of unlawful intent (Penal Law § 265.15[4] ), which the court properly submitted to the jury.
With respect to the conviction of third-degree possession, there was legally sufficient evidence that defendant constructively possessed the weapon outside his home or place of business. The evidence established that, as the police entered the apartment in question, a person acting on defendant's behalf deposited the weapon on the fire escape one floor directly below defendant's bedroom window, and that defendant exercised sufficient dominion and control over the weapon to constitute constructive possession (see generally People v. Manini, 79 N.Y.2d 561, 574-575, 584 N.Y.S.2d 282, 594 N.E.2d 563 [1992] ).
We also find that, with respect to both degrees of possession, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We decline to dismiss the third-degree possession conviction in the interest of justice.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 18, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)