Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MILLENIUM MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe III, J.), entered April 17, 2006, which, inter alia, confirmed an arbitration award and directed that plaintiff recover against the individual defendants as guarantors of a promissory note, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from decision, same court and Justice, entered April 17, 2006, which granted plaintiff's motion to confirm the arbitration award and for summary judgment as against the individual defendants, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
Upon denying a motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award, the court must confirm the award (CPLR 7511[e]; Matter of American Fed. Group v. AFG Partners, 277 A.D.2d 119, 120, 717 N.Y.S.2d 42 [2000], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 711, 727 N.Y.S.2d 697, 751 N.E.2d 945 [2001] ). The motion court's denial of the corporate defendants' motion to vacate the arbitration award against them was affirmed by this Court (37 A.D.3d 213, 827 N.Y.S.2d 866 [2007] ). There is no basis for the award not to be confirmed.
It is undisputed that the corporate defendants have not made the mandated payments under the promissory note and that the individual defendants are responsible for any unpaid amounts thereunder. Thus, the court properly granted plaintiff summary judgment against the individual defendants (see Takeuchi v. Silberman, 41 A.D.3d 336, 336-337, 839 N.Y.S.2d 71 [2007] ).
We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)