Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jerome WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of three counts of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law § 240.32). At a court appearance prior to the commencement of trial, County Court determined that defendant may be an incapacitated person, and the court issued an order of examination to the Director of Community Health Services for Cayuga County (see CPL 730.30 [1] ). “[O]nce [CPL] article 730 proceedings are set in motion, the requirements of that article must be met” (People v. Weech, 116 A.D.2d 975, 976, 498 N.Y.S.2d 601; see People v. Armlin, 37 N.Y.2d 167, 172, 371 N.Y.S.2d 691, 332 N.E.2d 870; People v. Vallelunga, 101 A.D.2d 603, 604, 474 N.Y.S.2d 857). The record establishes, however, that no psychiatric examinations were conducted pursuant to that order, and thus the requirements of CPL article 730 were not met. We therefore conclude that defendant was deprived of his right “to a full and impartial determination of his mental capacity” to stand trial (Armlin, 37 N.Y.2d at 172, 371 N.Y.S.2d 691, 332 N.E.2d 870; see CPL 730.20[1]; People v. Lowe, 109 A.D.2d 300, 304, 491 N.Y.S.2d 529, lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 653, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1049, 490 N.E.2d 566).
“Where a meaningful reconstruction hearing can be held, it is the proper remedy for violation of article 730” (People v. Bey, 144 A.D.2d 972, 973, 534 N.Y.S.2d 275). Here, a meaningful reconstruction hearing is feasible inasmuch as contemporaneous psychiatric examinations were conducted in connection with an unrelated proceeding in Wyoming County, less than 2 1/212 years have elapsed since the conclusion of the trial herein, and “those who observed defendant at trial, including the Trial Judge, can testify concerning their observations of defendant's behavior and demeanor at or near the time of trial” (People v. Gray, 190 A.D.2d 1057, 1057, 593 N.Y.S.2d 681; see People v. Allen, 224 A.D.2d 1027, 638 N.Y.S.2d 266). We therefore remit the matter to County Court for a reconstruction hearing before a different judge (see Allen, 224 A.D.2d 1027, 638 N.Y.S.2d 266; Gray, 190 A.D.2d at 1058, 593 N.Y.S.2d 681).
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved, and the matter is remitted to Cayuga County Court for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)