Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JONATHAN JOSE T., and Others, Dependent Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Mercedes F., Respondent-Appellant, Salvation Army Social Services of Greater New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about June 12 and 14, 2006, which, after a fact-finding determination that respondent mother had permanently neglected her children, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There was clear and convincing evidence to support the Family Court's determination that despite the agency's diligent efforts, respondent permanently neglected her children. Although respondent visited her children up until June 2004, she missed 19 visits in a 7-month period, and the quality of the visits was poor. In any event, visitation does not preclude a finding of permanent neglect where, as here, there has been a failure to plan for the children's future (Matter of Emanuel N.F. v. Lexington F., 22 A.D.3d 288, 289, 802 N.Y.S.2d 51 [2005] ). Indeed, the record demonstrates that although the agency referred respondent for a mental health evaluation and made numerous attempts to assist her in obtaining suitable housing, she failed to avail herself of these services (see Matter of Michenella I., 16 A.D.3d 353, 792 N.Y.S.2d 432 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 717, 808 N.Y.S.2d 141, 842 N.E.2d 27 [2005] ). The court also properly found that the best interests of the children would be served by terminating respondent's parental rights and not entering a suspended judgment, since respondent had no viable plan for the children's future, and freeing the children for adoption by their foster mother, with whom they have lived for three years, gave them the best chance for permanence and stability (see id.).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 18, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)