Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Melvin GARDNER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J. on motions; Edwin Torres, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered September 23, 2003, convicting defendant of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The motion and trial courts properly exercised their respective discretion in denying defendant's severance motions (see People v. Lane, 56 N.Y.2d 1, 451 N.Y.S.2d 6, 436 N.E.2d 456 [1982]; People v. Streitferdt, 169 A.D.2d 171, 176, 572 N.Y.S.2d 893 [1991], lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 1015, 575 N.Y.S.2d 823, 581 N.E.2d 1069 [1991] ). There was no material variance in the quantity of proof presented with respect to the charges relating to the two shooting incidents, and evidence as to the two incidents was presented separately and was capable of being easily segregated in the minds of the jurors.
The court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment made on the ground that the People violated defendant's right to testify before the grand jury. The parties' submissions established that the People lawfully proceeded without defendant's testimony in accordance with CPL 730.40(3), and that there was no factual issue warranting a hearing.
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 29, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)