Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Radiant BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John S. Moore, J.), rendered March 26, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 1/212 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly declined to submit the lesser included offense of criminally negligent homicide. Even when viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, there is no reasonable view of the evidence that he did not perceive the substantial and unjustifiable risk that handing a knife to the codefendant during a violent struggle with the victim would lead to the victim's death (see People v. Randolph, 81 N.Y.2d 868, 597 N.Y.S.2d 630, 613 N.E.2d 536; compare People v. Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943, 620 N.Y.S.2d 814, 644 N.E.2d 1370).
The court properly admitted, as an excited utterance, the victim's statement to her mother naming defendant as one of her attackers. The evidence established that the traumatized victim was under the stress of her injuries and was incapable of studied reflection (see People v. Johnson, 1 N.Y.3d 302, 772 N.Y.S.2d 238, 804 N.E.2d 402; People v. Brown, 70 N.Y.2d 513, 522 N.Y.S.2d 837, 517 N.E.2d 515).
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion made after the victim's mother mentioned the excluded contents of her 911 call, since there was minimal prejudice to defendant, particularly in light of the court's prompt curative instruction (see People v. Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865, 437 N.Y.S.2d 75, 418 N.E.2d 668).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 22, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)