Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lou-Ann ELIAS, etc., Petitioner, v. Raymond KELLY, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated March 20, 2007, finding petitioner guilty of engaging in prohibited conduct and directing that she forfeit the 40 days served in suspension, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Lewis Bart Stone, J.], entered December 10, 2007), dismissed, without costs.
Petitioner was present in the home of her estranged husband, where she had reason to believe marijuana plants were being grown, as evidenced by her admission that he was evasive about a room in the basement that was always kept locked and had told her about the idea to grow marijuana in the basement at least one or two weeks earlier. Given these facts and petitioner's use of the garage, which was in close proximity to the growing room from where the smell of marijuana and heat from the high intensity lamps were emanating, the finding that petitioner's ignorance of the criminal activity was deliberate was supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181-182, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183 [1978] ). No basis exists to disturb the credibility findings of the hearing officer (see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193 [1987] ).
Police discipline in New York City is subject to the Administrative Code of the City of New York and thus, the procedures set forth in Civil Service Law § 75 are inapplicable herein (see Matter of Montella v. Bratton, 93 N.Y.2d 424, 430, 691 N.Y.S.2d 372, 713 N.E.2d 406 [1999] ). Nor does the imposition of the 40-day suspension violate Administrative Code § 14-115(a) (former section 434a-14.0). Finally, we find that the penalty imposed does not shock the conscience (see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 39-40, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280 [2001] ).
We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)