Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin MIMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J. at hearing; Gregory Carro, J. at plea and sentence), rendered May 3, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380 [1977] ). After observing a traffic infraction, the police made a lawful stop of the livery cab in which defendant was riding (see People v. Robinson, 97 N.Y.2d 341, 741 N.Y.S.2d 147, 767 N.E.2d 638 [2001]; People v. Irizarry, 282 A.D.2d 483, 730 N.Y.S.2d 111 [2001], lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 705, 739 N.Y.S.2d 106, 765 N.E.2d 309 [2002] ). After properly asking defendant to step out of the cab (see People v. Alvarez, 308 A.D.2d 184, 187, 764 N.Y.S.2d 42 [2003], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 657, 782 N.Y.S.2d 699, 816 N.E.2d 572 [2004] ), an officer noticed a large bulge in defendant's crotch area. This observation, coupled with the officer's observation of defendant's furtive behavior when the cab was stopped, provided reasonable suspicion justifying a frisk (see People v. Williams, 287 A.D.2d 396, 732 N.Y.S.2d 338 [2001], lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 734, 740 N.Y.S.2d 708, 767 N.E.2d 165 [2002]; People v. Duncan, 234 A.D.2d 8, 650 N.Y.S.2d 644 [1996]; compare People v. Taveras, 155 A.D.2d 131, 553 N.Y.S.2d 305 [1990], appeal dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 871, 560 N.Y.S.2d 984, 561 N.E.2d 884 [1990] ). When the officer touched the bulge and felt a hard object that he reasonably believed could be a gun, he was entitled to reach into the crotch area and remove the object, which consisted of a package of drugs (see People v. Thompson, 232 A.D.2d 267, 648 N.Y.S.2d 548 [1996], lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 947, 655 N.Y.S.2d 898, 678 N.E.2d 511 [1997] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 28, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)