Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dorothy M. PANZARELLA, Respondent, v. MULTIPLE PARKING SERVICES, INC., Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)
We reject the contention of defendant that it had no actual or constructive notice of a dangerous icy condition on the parking lot where plaintiff fell and that it was not afforded a reasonable time after a temperature fluctuation that created the icy condition to exercise due care to correct the situation. The evidence establishes that the ice on the parking lot was “visible and apparent” and existed “for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit defendant's employees to discover and remedy it” (Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774). According to the testimony at trial, between three and nine hours passed from the time the ice formed until plaintiff's accident, and defendant's maintenance worker did not place rock salt on the parking lot until 45 minutes before plaintiff's accident. Thus, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence.
Supreme Court properly refused to charge the jury on implied assumption of the risk. The evidence at trial establishes that, at the time of her fall, plaintiff was not aware of the ice (see, Pisciotta v. Parisi, 155 A.D.2d 422, 547 N.Y.S.2d 352; Farina v. A.R.A. Servs., 151 A.D.2d 456, 542 N.Y.S.2d 246).
Finally, the jury award of $160,000 for future pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501[c]; see also, Kotopoulos v. Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 A.D.2d 276, 652 N.Y.S.2d 283 ). Plaintiff sustained a fractured distal radius and was forced to undergo two surgical procedures on her left wrist. She has permanent measurable deficiencies in her grip and pinch strength as a result. There are scars on her wrist, and her left arm has atrophied so that it is smaller than her right arm. Her wrist is permanently deformed and radiates inward. She will continue to suffer pain and discomfort as a result of weather and hand usage.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 25, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)