Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Stephanie FRESKOS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellant. [And A Third-Party Action].
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.), entered April 23, 1996, denying defendant's motion to set aside the jury's liability verdict, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint against the defendant New York City dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 7, 1995, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.
Plaintiff, an experienced equestrian, while riding a rented horse on the Central Park bridle path, lost control of the horse, which, when “spooked,” ran off of the bridle path and into the roadway in the vicinity of the 90th Street exit. Plaintiff was thrown, fracturing her leg, when the horse slipped. We reject plaintiff's contention that the City's liability arises from its failure to construct fencing segregating the bridle path from the roadway in the vicinity of the exit. Rather, plaintiff, an experienced voluntary participant in a potentially dangerous recreational event, assumed the risks associated with the reasonably foreseeable consequences of that activity.
Voluntary participants in sporting or recreational events are presumed “to have consented, by their participation, to those injury-causing events which are known, apparent or reasonably foreseeable consequences of the participation” (Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432, 439, 510 N.Y.S.2d 49, 502 N.E.2d 964; see also, Calise v. City of New York, 239 A.D.2d 378, 657 N.Y.S.2d 430) and are inherent in the activity (Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 662 N.Y.S.2d 421, 685 N.E.2d 202) in the absence of any indication of concealed (cf., Henig v. Hofstra Univ., 160 A.D.2d 761, 553 N.Y.S.2d 479; comp., Calabro v. Plattekill Mtn. Ski Ctr., 197 A.D.2d 558, 602 N.Y.S.2d 655, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 754, 612 N.Y.S.2d 378, 634 N.E.2d 979) or unreasonably increased risks (Morgan v. State of New York, supra), or reckless or intentional conduct, not herein present.
Accordingly, we reverse on the issue of liability and dismiss the complaint against the City.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 23, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)