Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maria VARGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ML 1188 GRAND CONCOURSE, L.P., Defendant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered on or about June 15, 2005, awarding plaintiff damages for past and future pain and suffering in the principal amounts of $100,000 and $200,000, respectively, upon her stipulation in lieu of a new trial on the issue of damages reducing the jury's awards for past and future pain and suffering from $160,000 and $500,000 (over 20 years), respectively, unanimously modified, on the facts, to reinstate the $160,000 award for past pain and suffering, and increase the $200,000 award for future pain and suffering to $300,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered November 26, 2004, which set aside the award of damages, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
As a result of the accident, plaintiff, then 54 years old, sustained radiculopathy at L5-S1 with nerve root compression, a herniated disc at L2-L3, and soft tissue injuries to the neck and back. She was treated by an orthopedist and physical therapist for eight months after the accident and had lumbar surgery four years after the accident, but at the time of trial, more than five years after the accident, still had pain in the lower back for which she takes medicine, and otherwise continued to suffer a loss of enjoyment of life. In these circumstances, the jury's award for future pain and suffering deviated materially from what is reasonable compensation to the extent indicated, but its award for past pain and suffering should not have been disturbed (cf. Skow v. Jones, Lang & Wooton Corp., 240 A.D.2d 194, 657 N.Y.S.2d 709 [1997], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 758, 704 N.Y.S.2d 532, 725 N.E.2d 1094 [1999] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 01, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)