Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Edward J. PORCELLI (admitted as Edward John Porcelli), a suspended attorney. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Edward J. Porcelli, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent, Edward J. Porcelli, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 11, 1974, as Edward John Porcelli, and, at all times relevant to this proceeding, maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department. On April 15, 1999, this Court granted the Disciplinary Committee's motion, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4(e)(1)(iii), to suspend respondent from the practice of law based upon uncontested evidence of professional misconduct. (Matter of Porcelli, 257 A.D.2d 124, 687 N.Y.S.2d 635.)
The Committee now moves for an order disbarring respondent from the practice of law. Pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 603.4(g), the Committee's notice of motion to suspend respondent advised him that an attorney who is suspended and who has not appeared or applied in writing for a hearing or reinstatement for six months from the date of an order of suspension may be disbarred without further notice. Despite service of the instant motion upon respondent at two different addresses, he has failed to appear or apply in writing for a hearing or reinstatement. More than six months have passed since the date of his suspension.
Accordingly, the Committee's motion should be granted (Matter of Tucker, 241 A.D.2d 250, 670 N.Y.S.2d 855), and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys, effective immediately.
Motion granted and respondent disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 23, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)