Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The BOARD OF MANAGERS OF MANHATTAN VALLEY TOWNHOUSES, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lucille MUROVICH, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered August 27, 1999, which, upon plaintiff condominium's motion for summary judgment, declared in its favor that defendants owner and occupant of the subject unit violated plaintiff's by-laws and rules and regulations by installing black plexiglass over the iron gates enclosing the vestibule under the stairway in front of the door to their unit without obtaining plaintiff's prior consent, and granted related injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendants' argument that plaintiff waived its right to enforce the “prior consent” rule as against their plexiglass installation because it did not enforce the rule as against two other unit owners who installed black plexiglass over their gates was properly rejected by the IAS court in view of the plain differences between the entrances of the units being compared. In particular, the gates over the doors to the two other units are flush with the building wall and therefore, unlike the gates to defendants' unit, which are at right angles to the building wall, do not encompass a vestibule, admittedly a common element as to which no alterations may be made without plaintiff's prior consent. No issue of fact as to a waiver is raised absent any evidence of a plexiglass installation to a unit configured like defendants' unit. We have considered and rejected defendants' other arguments.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 01, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)