Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael A. WOLFSON, M.D., M.P.H., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PREVENTATIVE MEDICINE CLINICAL SERVICES, Richard P. Oates, Ph.D., Individually and as a Partner in Preventative Medicine Clinical Services, and Michael B. Lax, M.D., M.P.H., Individually and as a Partner in Preventative Medicine Clinical Services, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a share of the partnership proceeds of the medical practice of which he was a member by virtue of his employment agreement with the State University of New York. Pursuant to the terms of an agreement signed by plaintiff, the medical practice was subject to the United University Professions (UUP) Agreement (Agreement). Article 29 of the Agreement provided that the medical practice had to be in compliance with Article XVI of the Board of Trustee Policies concerning, inter alia, the compensation of the members of the clinical practices. Section 29.1 of the Agreement further provided that “[t]he provisions of Article XVI ․ shall be subject to review in the grievance procedure,” and section 7.1 provided that the grievance “process ․ shall be the sole method for the resolution of grievances.” Section 7.5(d) of the Agreement provided that, in the event that a grievance was not resolved following Step 1 through Step 3 grievances, then “UUP, upon grievant's request,” may proceed to arbitration.
Plaintiff brought two different grievances and one improper practice charge and, although each was unsuccessful, plaintiff commenced this action rather than proceeding to arbitration. Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Where, as here, “ ‘an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract’ ” (Yoonessi v. State, 289 A.D.2d 998, 999, 735 N.Y.S.2d 900, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 609, 746 N.Y.S.2d 693, 774 N.E.2d 758, cert. denied 537 U.S. 1047, 123 S.Ct. 602, 154 L.Ed.2d 521, quoting Board of Educ. v. Ambach, 70 N.Y.2d 501, 508, 522 N.Y.S.2d 831, 517 N.E.2d 509, cert. denied sub nom. Margolin v. Board of Educ., 485 U.S. 1034, 108 S.Ct. 1593, 99 L.Ed.2d 908). Here, the grievance procedure, including arbitration, is the sole remedy provided to plaintiff concerning issues involving his compensation, and thus plaintiff may not seek redress in another forum.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 03, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)