Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ANTHONY B., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about October 14, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and unlawful possession of weapons by persons under sixteen, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Appellant's suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. The police acted lawfully in approaching appellant to inquire whether he had heard the screams heard by the officers, since he was in the area from which the screams emanated (see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 581 N.Y.S.2d 619, 590 N.E.2d 204). According due deference to the credibility determinations of the hearing court, we conclude that after appellant dropped his backpack on the ground at his feet, the arresting officer did not engage in any unlawful touching of the backpack. In the circumstances here presented, we find the officer's manner of handling the bag to be reasonable (see, People v. Batista, 88 N.Y.2d 650, 653, 649 N.Y.S.2d 356, 672 N.E.2d 581). When the officer inadvertently felt a handgun in the backpack, probable cause existed for appellant's arrest. The officer acted reasonably in opening the backpack, which was within appellant's grabbable area, to secure the gun (see, Matter of Marrhonda G., 81 N.Y.2d 942, 945, 597 N.Y.S.2d 662, 613 N.E.2d 568), while her partner acted to secure appellant (see, People v. Smith, 59 N.Y.2d 454, 458, 465 N.Y.S.2d 896, 452 N.E.2d 1224).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)