Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jose Luis HUERTAS-PEREZ, an attorney and counselor-at-law. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Jose Luis Huertas-Perez, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent Jose Luis Huertas-Perez was admitted to the practice of law by the First Judicial Department on January 11, 1993, and at all times relevant herein has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Respondent was charged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with two counts of extortion in violation of 18 USC 1951[b][2], to which he pleaded guilty on or about June 25, 1999. The conviction arose in connection with respondent's position as a Hearing Officer employed by the Administrative Tribunal of the New York City Department of Health. Respondent took funds from a restaurant in exchange for the reduction of administrative penalties. This taking under color of official right, giving rise to the Federal conviction, is essentially similar to the New York felony of larceny by extortion (Penal Law § 155.05[2][e]; Matter of Margiotta, 60 N.Y.2d 147, 468 N.Y.S.2d 857, 456 N.E.2d 798), warranting respondent's automatic disbarment (Judiciary Law § 90[4][e] ). Hence, the petition seeking an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90[4][a] should be granted.
Petition granted and respondent disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, as indicated.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)