Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ruben CAMPOSANO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), rendered September 13, 1996, convicting defendant, after trial, of two counts of kidnapping in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 17 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility.
The record fails to support defendant's claim that the prosecutor made a summation argument accusing defense counsel of fraudulent conduct. The remainder of defendant's challenges to the People's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged comments were proper responses to the defense summation (see, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, 666 N.Y.S.2d 572, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 976, 672 N.Y.S.2d 855, 695 N.E.2d 724).
The court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to remove a juror or conduct an inquiry after defense counsel complained that the juror's demeanor during trial suggested partiality, since neither co-counsel, the prosecutor nor the court observed the complained-of conduct (see, People v. Gonzalez, 247 A.D.2d 328, 670 N.Y.S.2d 180; People v. Glover, 237 A.D.2d 104, 655 N.Y.S.2d 345, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1093, 660 N.Y.S.2d 386, 682 N.E.2d 987), and since the court promptly delivered instructions to the jury that were sufficient to prevent any prejudice.
Defendant was not entitled to be present at a robing room conference concerning a matter of law, since defendant would have had no meaningful input (People v. Velasco, 77 N.Y.2d 469, 568 N.Y.S.2d 721, 570 N.E.2d 1070).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 03, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)