Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Michael HAJOVSKY, Petitioner-Respondent-Appellant, For a Judgment, etc., v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents-Appellants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), entered July 30, 1998, insofar as it denied petitioner's request in this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul respondents' denial of petitioner's application for a newsstand license (Application No. 920807) and order, same court and Justice, entered August 17, 1998, which denied petitioner's motion for leave to submit an amended reply, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly concluded that denial of the license application for the Broadway/43rd Street site was rationally based, since there is no dispute that, at the time of the Department of Transportation site inspection, the proposed newsstand location was directly in front of a building entrance, which circumstance is a violation of 6 RCNY § 2-68(b)(5)(iii). The appropriate remedy for petitioner to have pursued was the filing of a new application with a new site plan that reflected the changed conditions following demolition and reconstruction at the site.
We note that, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, respondents' appeal from that portion of the order that directed them to issue a newsstand license under Application No. 920813 has been withdrawn and discontinued with prejudice.
The court properly denied petitioner's motion for leave to submit an amended reply, since the matters raised therein were not before the agency.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 01, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)