Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ANGELINA W., Tiffany W. and Stanford W., III. Erie County Department of Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent; Stanford W., Respondent, Deborah W., Respondent–Appellant.
In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother appeals from an order that adjudicated her three children to be neglected by both of their parents as a result of the violation of an order of protection requiring respondent father to stay away from the family home and the children. That order of protection was entered in connection with a criminal proceeding against the father arising from an incident in which he punched his then eight-year-old daughter in the face, causing bruising and swelling to her eye. We reject the contention of the mother that the evidence at the hearing is insufficient to support the adjudication of neglect against her (see generally Family Ct. Act § 1051[a] ). The record establishes that, with knowledge of his physically abusive tendencies and in knowing violation of the order of protection, the mother allowed the father to be alone in the family home with the children over the course of at least two days, thereby creating an imminent danger of impairment of the children's “ physical, mental or emotional condition,” (§ 1012[f][i] ), i.e., by “ unreasonably inflicting or allowing to be inflicted harm, or a substantial risk thereof, including the infliction of excessive corporal punishment” (§ 1012[f] [i][B]; see Matter of Paul U., 12 A.D.3d 969, 971, 785 N.Y.S.2d 767; see also Matter of Cadejah AA., 25 A.D.3d 1027, 1028, 809 N.Y.S.2d 598, lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 705, 819 N.Y.S.2d 872, 853 N.E.2d 243; Matter of Nicole B., 308 A.D.2d 412, 764 N.Y.S.2d 451; see generally Matter of Kayla F., 39 A.D.3d 983, 985–986, 833 N.Y.S.2d 742).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 28, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)