Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of OAK BEACH INN CORP., Petitioner, For a Review, etc., v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, Respondent.
In this proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 and transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered December 11, 1998, to review a determination of respondent State Liquor Authority, dated October 6, 1998, which canceled petitioner's liquor license, effective October 28, 1998, and imposed a $1,000 bond claim and a $2,000 civil penalty, the petition granted only to the extent of annulling and vacating the penalty of license revocation and remitting the matter to respondent for the prompt imposition of an appropriate lesser penalty. In all other respects, the petition is denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs.
While there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent's findings that petitioner attempted to impede a lawful investigation by respondent's representatives in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106(15) and kept contaminated alcoholic beverages on its premises in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106(2),such violations do not justify the severity of the penalty imposed given petitioner's virtually unblemished record prior and subsequent to the isolated 1992 incident, (cf., Matter of M.P.N. Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 206 A.D.2d 430, 614 N.Y.S.2d 540).
Reargument granted, and upon reargument, the unpublished Decision and Order of this Court entered on September 28, 1999 (Appeal No. 1809), recalled and vacated and new decision and order substituted therefor.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 10, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)