Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daniel VINOKUR, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. PENNY LANE OWNERS CORP., et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants, GMAC Mortgage Corp., Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.), entered October 7, 1998, which, in an action by a tenant/shareholder against a residential cooperative for, inter alia, a declaration that his breach of the lease has been cured, and against a mortgage company for an injunction against its foreclosing on his shares, denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against the mortgage company foreclosing on the shares, and granted the coop's cross motion to dismiss the action and for attorneys' fees to the extent of dismissing the action, unanimously modified, on the law, to award the coop attorneys' fees, and remand for an assessment of the reasonable value thereof, and otherwise affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by plaintiff to defendants-respondents-appellants.
The action was properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff's claims, including that the warrant of eviction was obtained fraudulently, should have been raised in the Civil Court proceeding that resulted in the issuance of the warrant. A litigant's remedy for alleged fraud in the course of a legal proceeding “lies exclusively in that lawsuit itself, i.e., by moving pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate the civil judgment due to its fraudulent procurement, not a second plenary action collaterally attacking the judgment in the original action.” (Yalkowsky v. Century Apts. Assocs., 215 A.D.2d 214, 215, 626 N.Y.S.2d 181; see also, Matter of Stilwell, 139 N.Y. 337, 340-341, 34 N.E. 777). The same is true with respect to plaintiff's claim that the alterations underlying the judgment of possession have been cured, an issue that has now been considered on the merits by Civil Court and is pending before Appellate Term (see, Ansonia Assocs. v. Costa, 167 A.D.2d 134, 561 N.Y.S.2d 438, lv. denied 77 N.Y.2d 802, 566 N.Y.S.2d 587, 567 N.E.2d 981). The lease provision for attorneys' fees covers this litigation brought by plaintiff to be restored to possession (see, Simithis v. 4 Keys Leasing & Maintenance Co., 151 A.D.2d 339, 341-342, 542 N.Y.S.2d 595), and, accordingly, we modify to award the attorneys' fees to the coop.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 15, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)