Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Troy WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J. ), rendered May 8, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Since a fair reading of the record as a whole establishes that defendant abandoned his attempts to introduce evidence that the police recovered two firearms, in different locations, in addition to the weapon with whose possession defendant was charged, we find defendant's present arguments on this issue to be unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the evidence was excessively remote. In any event, were we to find any error in this regard, we would find it to be harmless because defendant was acquitted of the only charges upon which these other weapons had even a remote bearing.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for an adverse inference charge with respect to the People's failure to introduce a bullet mentioned in testimony. In any event, defendant was acquitted of the only charges to which the bullet related.
The record contains no suggestion that defendant was excluded from robing room conferences with prospective jurors. Accordingly, no reconstruction hearing is warranted.
Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 15, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)