Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carnell McGILL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered March 23, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree (four counts), assault in the second degree (three counts) and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 27 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification. We note that the victim's testimony was extensively corroborated by circumstantial evidence.
Defendant was not denied his right of confrontation, or otherwise prejudiced, when the court admitted the tape of a 911 call placed by the testifying victim's nontestifying friend. The victim is heard on the tape providing the relevant information to his friend, who then passes it on to the 911 operator. The court instructed the jury to disregard the statements made by the victim's friend, and specifically told the jury that the friend was not a witness to the robbery. There is no Confrontation Clause issue presented since the jury is presumed to have followed the court's instructions (see People v. Davis, 58 N.Y.2d 1102, 462 N.Y.S.2d 816, 449 N.E.2d 710 [1983] ), and since the victim was subject to cross-examination.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 27, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)