Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert F. JACOBS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elaine LEWIS, Defendant-Respondent, Nabeel Zahran, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about April 8, 1998, which granted the motion of defendant Elaine Lewis to dismiss the complaint as against her pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) and 3212, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court properly found, plaintiffs' conclusory assertions to the contrary notwithstanding (see, S.J. Capelin Assocs., Inc. v. Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 338, 342, 357 N.Y.S.2d 478, 313 N.E.2d 776), that defendant Lewis was not a party to and, accordingly, was not bound by the subject contract. The court also correctly concluded that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for fraud. Lewis's alleged misrepresentations amounted to no more than opinions and puffery or ultimately unfulfilled promises, and in either case were not actionable as fraud (see, DH Cattle Holdings Co. v. Smith, 195 A.D.2d 202, 208, 607 N.Y.S.2d 227; see also, Brown v. Lockwood, 76 A.D.2d 721, 432 N.Y.S.2d 186). Further, as plaintiffs admitted to personally conducting an investigation of the work of Zahran Interiors, the contractor they ultimately retained, they can make no sustainable claim that they relied to their detriment upon Lewis's representations as to her own expertise or the expertise of Zahran (see, 200 East End Ave. Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 5 A.D.2d 415, 172 N.Y.S.2d 409, affd. 6 N.Y.2d 731, 185 N.Y.S.2d 816, 158 N.E.2d 508).
We have reviewed plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 04, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)