Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert PHILLIPS, David Rose, Neil Czerniak, Douglas Bedker, Angela Carpenter, Patricia Chapman, Bonnie Watson, Charilla Sandstrom Conner, Karen Arthmann, and Beverly Fisher, Plaintiffs-Petitioners-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MONROE, Monroe County Legislature of the County of Monroe, Wayne E. Zyra, as President of the Monroe County Legislature, Maggie Brooks, in her Capacity as the County Executive of the County of Monroe, Defendants-Respondents-Respondents, The State of New York (Department of Taxation and Finance and Department of Health), Respondent.
For the reasons stated in our decision in Matter of Monroe County Pub. School Dists. v. Zyra, 51 A.D.3d 125, 853 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2008 WL 748026 [2008], we modify the judgment by vacating the decretal paragraphs granting declaratory and other relief with respect to the meaning of Tax Law § 1262(f)(8), and by granting plaintiffs-petitioners (plaintiffs) the same declaratory relief granted in that case. We note in addition that plaintiffs have standing herein by virtue of their status as taxpayers (see General Municipal Law § 51; Matter of Bernstein v. Feiner, 13 A.D.3d 519, 520-521, 787 N.Y.S.2d 357; see generally Matter of Korn v. Gulotta, 72 N.Y.2d 363, 371-372, 534 N.Y.S.2d 108, 530 N.E.2d 816), and that there were no Open Meetings Law or other notice violations requiring nullification of the actions taken by defendant-respondent Monroe County Legislature on September 26, 2007. Finally, “[b]ecause a compelling nonconstitutional ground resolves this appeal, we refrain ․ from addressing the constitutional issues raised” (Matter of Clara C. v. William L., 96 N.Y.2d 244, 250, 727 N.Y.S.2d 20, 750 N.E.2d 1068).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the decretal paragraphs granting declaratory and other relief with respect to the meaning of Tax Law § 1262(f)(8) and by granting judgment in favor of plaintiffs-petitioners as follows:
It is ADJUDGED and DECLARED that defendant-respondent County of Monroe is obligated to allocate to those school districts in Monroe County that are outside the City of Rochester their full statutory share of sales tax net collections, as defined in Tax Law § 1262(f)(1), undiminished by the election of the sales tax intercept option
and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 21, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)