Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Stephanie KENNEDY, Petitioner-Appellant, For a Judgment, etc., v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered January 25, 1999, which denied petitioner's application to annul respondent City's determination terminating petitioner's employment in the noncompetitive, nontenured position of Houseparent with the Administration for Children's Services, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The proceeding was properly dismissed upon a finding that respondent's termination of petitioner's employment was not made in bad faith (see, Matter of Johnson v. Katz, 68 N.Y.2d 649, 505 N.Y.S.2d 64, 496 N.E.2d 223). While petitioner claims that it was bad faith for respondent to involuntarily transfer her to a night shift without giving her a reasonable opportunity to arrange for child care, she adduces no evidence that she ever sought such an accommodation or invoked the hardship exception provisions of the collective bargaining agreement. Instead, respondent shows, petitioner simply absented herself from work while she pursued her unsuccessful grievance that other, more junior employees should have been made to work the night shift. Such unauthorized absence negates any inference of bad faith (see, Matter of Dippell v. Hammons, 246 A.D.2d 450, 668 N.Y.S.2d 185, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 801, 677 N.Y.S.2d 71, 699 N.E.2d 431; Matter of Baugh v. Stern, 160 A.D.2d 617, 559 N.Y.S.2d 243, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 709, 561 N.Y.S.2d 913, 563 N.E.2d 284).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)