Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Brian DEVOY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. 1110/1130 STADIUM OWNERS CORP., Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, Staley Elevator Company, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered February 8, 1999, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained as a result of an allegedly defective elevator, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant elevator maintenance company's motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims as against it, and denied defendant building owner's motion for the same relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff's invocation of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur as against the elevator maintenance company was properly rejected under the present circumstances, where plaintiff himself kicked open the elevator shaftway door (see, Burgess v. Otis Elev. Co., 114 A.D.2d 784, 787, 495 N.Y.S.2d 376, affd. 69 N.Y.2d 623, 511 N.Y.S.2d 227, 503 N.E.2d 692). The uncontradicted deposition testimony is that a plastic bag became stuck in the overspeed governor located in the elevator motor room, and that this caused the elevator to stop between floors. That the shaftway door was closed when the elevator stopped and was opened by plaintiff's voluntary action does not, as the building owner argues, constitute a supervening cause of the accident as a matter of law. Whether plaintiff's attempt to extricate himself from the stuck elevator was a foreseeable consequence of an emergency situation created by the building owner's alleged negligence in not properly maintaining the motor room is an issue of fact (see, Humbach v. Goldstein, 255 A.D.2d 420, 686 N.Y.S.2d 54). We have considered the building owner's other contentions and find them unpersuasive.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 21, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)