Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Susan WILBER and Tony Wilber, Appellants, For Discovery in Aid of Bringing an Action. (Action No. 1.) Susan Wilber and Anthony Wilber, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Quality Vacuum Forming Machine Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.
Quality Vacuum Forming Machine Company, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Foamex International, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Susan Wilber and Anthony Wilber, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pak-Tech, Inc., et al., Defendants, Recticel Foam Corporation, Foamex, L.P., Foamex International, Inc., and David Zawierucha, Defendants-Respondents. (Action No. 3.) (Appeal No. 1.)
Susan Wilber and Tony Wilber sought pre-action discovery by application designated as action No. 1, and they thereafter commenced action Nos. 2 and 3 seeking damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff Susan Wilber when her left hand became caught in the rollers of a die cutting machine, partially amputating several of her fingers. Supreme Court properly granted that part of the cross motion of defendants Foamex, L.P., Foamex International, Inc. and David Zawierucha seeking to change the venue of action No. 3 to Cattaraugus County and to consolidate action Nos. 2 and 3 in Cattaraugus County, where action No. 2 was properly commenced (see Kay v. Kritzer, 298 A.D.2d 560, 748 N.Y.S.2d 679). The court erred, however, in failing to decide the remaining part of the cross motion seeking dismissal of action No. 3 against Zawierucha and the remaining parts of the motion made and orally argued before it prior to changing the venue of action No. 3, and instead “transferr[ing] and deferr[ing]” such matters to Cattaraugus County (see Judiciary Law § 21). We therefore modify the order by vacating the last two ordering paragraphs and remit the matter to Supreme Court, Erie County, for that court to render a decision forthwith on those issues left unresolved (see id.).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the last two ordering paragraphs and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 05, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)