Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph BRENIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered March 26, 1998, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of grand larceny in the third degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 1/212 to 5 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court's verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's larcenous intent could be readily inferred from his conduct and from the surrounding circumstances (see, People v. Moran, 123 N.Y. 254, 256-257, 25 N.E. 412; People v. Smith, 140 A.D.2d 259, 528 N.Y.S.2d 562, lv. denied 72 N.Y.2d 924, 532 N.Y.S.2d 858, 529 N.E.2d 189). Defendant surreptitiously entered a car whose engine was running, released the emergency brake and operated the gearshift lever, stepped on the accelerator pedal even after the complainant had jumped onto the hood of the car, and fled from the scene when another vehicle blocked the car from moving. The momentary nature of this interrupted taking does not preclude a finding of larcenous intent. Defendant's actions as a whole also establish that although the car did not actually move, defendant exercised control over the vehicle, thus satisfying the asportation requirement for a completed larceny (see, People v. Robinson, 60 N.Y.2d 982, 983, 471 N.Y.S.2d 258, 459 N.E.2d 483; People v. Alamo, 34 N.Y.2d 453, 458-460, 358 N.Y.S.2d 375, 315 N.E.2d 446; People v. Roman, 167 A.D.2d 262, 561 N.Y.S.2d 763, lv. denied 77 N.Y.2d 881, 568 N.Y.S.2d 924, 571 N.E.2d 94).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 02, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)