Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Firdosh Keki DOCTOR, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brenda L. JULIANA, et al., Defendants, Scott H. Hughes, Defendant-Appellant.
Plaintiff, a front-seat passenger in a motor vehicle operated by defendant Sesa N. Juliana, was injured when Juliana's vehicle collided with a vehicle owned and operated by Scott H. Hughes (defendant) at the intersection of Walnut and Vine Streets in the City of Lockport. That intersection is controlled by a four-way flashing signal, flashing yellow for east/west traffic on Walnut Street and flashing red for north/south traffic on Vine Street. Juliana was operating her vehicle southbound on Vine Street and defendant was operating his vehicle westbound on Walnut Street. Juliana failed to stop at the flashing red signal and struck defendant's vehicle in the area of the passenger side door.
Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and all cross claims against him on the ground that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the failure of Juliana to stop at the flashing red signal. Supreme Court properly denied the motion. It is well established that there may be more than one proximate cause of an injury (see, Argentina v. Emery World Wide Delivery Corp., 93 N.Y.2d 554, 560, n. 2, 693 N.Y.S.2d 493, 715 N.E.2d 495; Forte v. City of Albany, 279 N.Y. 416, 422, 18 N.E.2d 643, rearg. denied 280 N.Y. 572, 20 N.E.2d 21). Here, although it is undisputed that Juliana failed to stop, plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence to raise an issue of fact concerning the alleged negligence of defendant, i.e., whether he failed to use reasonable care when proceeding into the intersection (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1113[b]; § 1180 [a], [e]; Shea v. Judson, 283 N.Y. 393, 398, 28 N.E.2d 885; Walker v. Dartmouth Plan Leasing Corp., 180 A.D.2d 952, 953-954, 580 N.Y.S.2d 535; LaForge v. All Am. Car Rental [appeal No. 1], 155 A.D.2d 873, 548 N.Y.S.2d 954; see also, 1A N.Y. PJI 3d 2:80A).
Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)