Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CASA REDIMIX CONCRETE CORP., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A., Defendant.
FC Bruckner Associates, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth Michael Colao, Defendant-Respondent. [And Other Actions].
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered on or about January 25, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant Michael Colao's CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss insofar as to dismiss plaintiff's eleventh cause of action for fraudulent inducement as against him, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
In this consolidated action alleging, inter alia, breach of a shopping mall construction contract, the IAS court properly dismissed plaintiff lessee/developer's claim for fraudulent inducement as against general contractor York Hunter's president, defendant-respondent Michael Colao. Plaintiff and defendant general contractor, York Hunter of New York, Inc., had entered into a letter agreement providing for, inter alia, York's expedited completion of certain specified contractual work, along with the removal of certain liens, in consideration of plaintiff's payment of $571,000 to York. Although plaintiff contends that this agreement was induced by Colao's representation that the $571,000 payment would be used by York to pay subcontractors at the work site, the letter agreement fails to indicate that it was so induced and, moreover, the consolidated complaint fails to set forth sufficient factual allegations to support a fraud claim based upon a statement of future intention (see, Non-Linear Trading Co. v. Braddis Assocs., Inc., 243 A.D.2d 107, 118, 675 N.Y.S.2d 5).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)