Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CUSTODY and Guardianship OF JACQUELINE A., et al., Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Elbert R., Respondent–Appellant, Cardinal McCloskey Services, Petitioner–Respondent, Commissioner of Social Services, Petitioner.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 7, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent father had permanently neglected the subject children, terminated respondent's parental rights with respect to the children, and granted custody and guardianship of them to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence supports Family Court's finding that respondent father permanently neglected the subject children by failing to plan for their future for more than a year after the children were placed with the agency despite the diligent efforts of petitioner agency to strengthen and encourage the parental relationship (see, Social Services Law § 384–b[7] [a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 142–143, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). Although encouraged to do so, respondent-appellant failed within the statutorily relevant time-frame to complete a parenting skills class.
Under all the relevant circumstances, the agency proved, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that it was in the best interests of the children that respondent-appellant's parental rights be terminated and the children be freed for adoption (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., supra, at 147–148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824).
We have considered respondent-appellant's remaining contention and find it unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 16, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)