Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Henry PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Respondent. Noel Pagan, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael DeMarco, J.), entered June 28, 2001, which granted the motion of defendant Mount Sinai Medical Center for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's cause of action against it for malicious prosecution and to dismiss, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) (7), plaintiff's cause of action against it for abuse of process, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Although the fight between plaintiff and other Mt. Sinai employees that led to plaintiff's arrest and his subsequent discharge from employment occurred at a party apparently sponsored by Mt. Sinai, there is no evidentiary support for plaintiff's contention that the employees involved were acting on behalf of Mt. Sinai or in furtherance of its business when they reported the incident to the police. The employees' conduct was precipitated by a personal matter and their actions did not fall within the scope of their employment (see Stavitz v. City of New York, 98 A.D.2d 529, 531, 471 N.Y.S.2d 272). Summary judgment dismissing the complaint for malicious prosecution as against Mt. Sinai was therefore proper. Also proper was the motion court's dismissal of the remaining cause, for abuse of process, against Mt. Sinai. No cause of action for abuse of process was stated against Mt. Sinai since plaintiff did not allege that Mt. Sinai made perverse use of the orders of protection issued by Criminal Court against plaintiff to obtain a collateral objective (see Curiano v. Suozzi, 63 N.Y.2d 113, 116, 480 N.Y.S.2d 466, 469 N.E.2d 1324).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 26, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)