Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP, etc., ANTONIO TYRONE B., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Lisa B., Respondent-Appellant, Louise Wise Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 13, 1999, which, upon a finding that respondent mother suffered from mental illness within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b(4)(c), terminated her parental rights to the subject children and awarded custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the City of New York for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence, including testimony by a court-appointed psychiatrist as well as the medical records documenting respondent's history of mental illness, supported Family Court's determination that respondent is presently and for the foreseeable future unable, by reason of mental illness, to provide proper and adequate care for her children (see Social Services Law § 384-b[4][c] ). Family Court properly admitted into evidence some of the records which the court-appointed psychiatrist relied on in forming her expert opinion and respondent's attorney never objected to admission of these documents on the ground that he had not had an opportunity to review the records and, in fact, extensively used the records in cross-examination. Respondent's counsel in addition made no objection to petitioner's expert testifying as to the ultimate issue in the case, i.e., whether respondent was unable for the foreseeable future to adequately care for the children due to her mental illness, and in any event, such expert opinion was clearly admissible (Matter of Sanovia G., 245 A.D.2d 207, 666 N.Y.S.2d 596).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 01, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)