Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nelson VENTURA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J. at hearing; Dorothy Cropper, J. at pleas and sentence), rendered January 20, 2000, convicting defendant of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 1/212 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant was not deprived of a fair suppression hearing by the court's denial of his request for the desk sergeant's log book and the request for analysis for the drugs seized from his accomplice. While defendant claimed these documents contained Rosario material, he did not establish that these documents recorded any statements by the testifying officer that were related to the subject matter of his testimony (see People v. Johnson, 286 A.D.2d 641, 730 N.Y.S.2d 324, lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 683, 738 N.Y.S.2d 299, 764 N.E.2d 403; People v. Kronberg, 243 A.D.2d 132, 153, 672 N.Y.S.2d 63, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 882, 678 N.Y.S.2d 29, 700 N.E.2d 567). The court's questioning of the People's witness merely expedited the hearing and did not unduly prejudice defendant (see People v. West, 210 A.D.2d 147, 621 N.Y.S.2d 12, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 944, 627 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 651 N.E.2d 931), and it properly exercised its discretion in imposing reasonable limits on cross-examination by precluding matters beyond the scope of the direct testimony and collateral to the subject of the hearing (see People v. Perciballi, 291 A.D.2d 360, 738 N.Y.S.2d 343, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 654, 745 N.Y.S.2d 512, 772 N.E.2d 615).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 08, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)