Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Keymarroo GUIDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, For the Appointment of a Guardian for Veronica Wallace, An Incapacitated Person, Sallie Floyd, et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered May 4, 2007, which dismissed petitioner's petition to be appointed the guardian over the person and property of his wife, Veronica Wallace, an alleged incapacitated person (AIP), and granted the cross petition of Corlinda Nicholson to be appointed the guardian over the person and property of her sister, the AIP, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition reinstated, the grant of the cross petition vacated, and the matter remanded for a hearing on the petition.
We express no opinion on the merits of petitioner's application. However, we disagree with Supreme Court that petitioner, a paroled convicted felon who had obtained a temporary certificate of relief from disabilities, could not, as a matter of law, serve as guardian for the AIP. Rules of the Chief Judge [22 NYCRR] § 36.2[c][7] contains no distinction between the rights conferred to an individual issued a temporary certificate of relief from disabilities (one issued while an individual is on parole) (see Correction Law § 703[4] ) and those same rights which cease being temporary when the individual is released from parole (id.).
The court's apparent exclusion of petitioner from the hearing on the cross petition was improper. Although the parties dispute whether petitioner and the AIP were married, the evidence that the couple resided together for several years and had two children together made such exclusion improper.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 03, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)