Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JOSARAH GLORIA C., a Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Veronica B., Respondent-Appellant, The New York Foundling Hospital, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about October 6, 2005, which denied respondent mother's motion to vacate orders entered April 19, 2005 on default, one determining that she permanently neglected her daughter, and the second terminating her parental rights to her daughter, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of granting the motion to vacate the default on termination of parental rights and remanding for a new dispositional hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Respondent's failure to appear on the date of the inquest, April 5, 2005, was a direct result of her attorney's error, was not part of a pattern of dilatory behavior (Spyropoulos v. Hirsh, 21 A.D.3d 818, 801 N.Y.S.2d 288 [2005] ). As to the merits of her defense, respondent failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the court's finding of permanent neglect. The record establishes that despite petitioner agency's diligent efforts, respondent failed to participate regularly in counseling, returned her daughter to petitioner less than two months after she was given the opportunity to resume caring for her, and declined homemaking services. Nevertheless, she did present sufficient evidence that the foster parents who have cared for the child for eight years are not committing to adopting her, and that the now 10-year-old daughter does not wish to be adopted. Under these circumstances (see Matter of Amber AA., 301 A.D.2d 694, 697, 754 N.Y.S.2d 387 [2003]; Matter of Miguel Angel Andrew R., 263 A.D.2d 354, 692 N.Y.S.2d 376 [1999] ), respondent has provided a potentially meritorious defense to the termination of her parental rights on default (see Matter of Vanessa B., 23 A.D.3d 273, 808 N.Y.S.2d 10 [2005] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 07, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)