Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dennis FRIEDMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Blagoi JANCESKI, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about October 7, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by appellants' brief, granted plaintiffs judgment creditors' motion to vacate the satisfaction of judgment unless defendants judgment debtors paid the Sheriff's poundage fee within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The satisfaction of judgment, which was prepared by defendants, plainly states that defendants had “assumed the obligation to pay the Sheriff's fees”. It also appears that at the closing at which defendants paid the principal and interest on the judgment, their attorney drew a check to the Sheriff in the amount of the poundage and gave a copy thereof to plaintiffs. That check was, however, returned by defendants' attorney and never delivered to the Sheriff.
Clearly, the satisfaction was conditioned upon defendants' payment of poundage. Defendants' argument that their obligation to pay poundage should be reduced by the amount of interest they paid on the judgment that plaintiffs had previously waived, but, shortly before the closing, insisted be paid, is without merit, absent anything in the record indicating that defendants attempted to enforce the waiver at the closing or otherwise disputed their obligation to pay interest. Defendants' payment of interest at the closing, and their promise to pay the poundage in a document they themselves drafted, refutes their claim that the waiver continued to be effective.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 19, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)