Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nelson ALMANZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLLEGIATE CHURCH CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered December 15, 1997, which, in an action for employment discrimination on the basis of age, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Assuming that plaintiff demonstrated a prima facie case, defendant demonstrated that its decision to terminate plaintiff was based on legitimate, independent and nondiscriminatory reasons (see, Ferrante v. American Lung Assn., 90 N.Y.2d 623, 629, 665 N.Y.S.2d 25, 687 N.E.2d 1308), and, since plaintiff's response failed “to raise a question of fact concerning the falsity of defendant's proffered basis for the termination or that discrimination was more likely the real reason”, summary judgment was properly granted (id., at 631, 665 N.Y.S.2d 25, 687 N.E.2d 1308). We agree with the IAS court that the deposition testimony of plaintiff's friend and co-worker that their supervisor told him, a week after plaintiff was terminated, that the supervisor was “going to try to get somebody younger to work that job” raised merely an isolated and ambiguous statement insufficient to support a finding of age discrimination (see, Melnyk v. Adria Labs., 799 F.Supp. 301, 319). The co-worker acknowledged that the supervisor did not disclose to him the reasons why plaintiff was terminated, and the specific remark did not directly state or imply that plaintiff was terminated for a discriminatory reason. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be unpersuasive.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 19, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)