Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LESSIE VILLALBA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF AUBURN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Cayuga County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action sounding in negligence, negligent training, and excessive force against, among others, defendant City of Auburn (City). According to plaintiff, during a traffic stop, City police officers dragged plaintiff to the hood of her vehicle and slammed her head into the hood. Plaintiff alleges that she was denied medical treatment at the police station. In lieu of answering, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. Supreme Court, inter alia, reserved decision on the motion insofar as it was based on the ground that plaintiff failed to properly serve the City and held that a traverse hearing was required, but otherwise denied the motion on the other grounds raised. The City appeals from the order and judgment to the extent that it denied the motion on those other grounds.
The court should have first conducted the traverse hearing and determined the jurisdictional issue before making a determination on the other grounds raised on the motion (see Elm Mgt. Corp. v Sprung, 33 AD3d 753, 755 [2d Dept 2006]; 77 Commercial Holding, LLC v Central Plastic, Inc., 46 Misc 3d 80, 83 [App Term, 2d Dept, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to Supreme Court to conduct a traverse hearing and thereafter make a determination on the motion.
Entered: May 1, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 168
Decided: May 01, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)