Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dasheim GREENE, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Curtis J. Farber, J.), entered on or about July 19, 2023, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's assessment of 30 points under risk factor 3 was supported by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant victimized three young girls by sexually exploiting them for his own personal gain (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 10 [2006]; see also People v. Torres, 220 AD3d 514 [1st Dept 2023], lv denied 41 NY3d 908 [2024] ).
Defendant was also properly assessed points under risk factor 7 for his relationship with the victims “because the evidence clearly established that defendant at least promoted the relationship for the purpose of such victimization,” regardless of the circumstances under which they met (People v. Brunson, 154 AD3d 499, 499 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 908 [2018]; see also People v. Cook, 29 NY3d 121, 126 [2017] ).
The SORA court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure, and defendant has set forth no basis for this Court to exercise its discretion to grant the departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014] ). The mitigating factors cited by defendant either were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by aggravating factors including the seriousness of his offenses.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Ind. No. 2854 /19
Decided: April 09, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)